Spiritual Ideas Spiritual Articles    Spirituality Information    Improve Your Life

Home
Mission Statement
Spiritual Books
Angels
Buddhism
Zen Buddhism
Catharism
Druze
Taoism
Bahai Faith
Christianity
Confucianism
Gnosticism
Hinduism
Sikhism
Jainism
Jehovah's Witnesses
Judaism
Islam
Mandaeism
Manichaeism
Mythology
Neoplatonism
Rosicrucian
Shamanism
Sufism
Spiritual Thoughts
Intension

New Testament Bible Stories

Old Testament Bible Stories

Lectures
Yoga Sutras of Patanjali
Lost Gospels
 

 Beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses



Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's WitnessesThe entire Biblical canon, excluding the Apocrypha, is considered the inspired word of God. A literal interpretation of the Bible is followed, though it is acknowledged that biblical writers and characters also employed symbolism, parable, figures of speech, and poeticism. Only the Bible should be used for determining issues of doctrine. Interpretation of scripture and codification of doctrines is the responsibility of the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses.


The Tetragrammaton God is the creator and supreme being, sovereign of the universe. Using God's name, Jehovah (a derivative of the Tetragrammaton), is a requirement for true worship. Jesus is God's first creation, used by God to create everything else. Jesus is literally the only begotten Son of God, and received his life from God. He is the means through whom to approach God in prayer, and is also the means of salvation for all worthy mankind. His role as mediator of the "new covenant" is limited to those going to heaven, whose number totals 144,000. The vast majority of Jehovahs' Witnesses will live on a renewed paradise on Earth. They believe that Jesus did not die on a cross but on a "torture stake". The holy spirit is not a person but is God's active force. Mary was not perpetually a virgin, but bore more children after Jesus. The soul is the person itself, not an immaterial entity that dwells inside the body. Death is a state of non-existence with no consciousness. Hades or Sheol is the designated common grave of all mankind. They do not believe in any Hell of fiery torment. The "last days" began in 1914 and Armageddon is imminent. All other religions are false and they will shortly come under attack by governments worldwide. After false religion is destroyed, governments also face destruction.Any who are not deemed faithful by God will be destroyed with no hope of resurrection.[88] The fate of some, such as small children or the mentally ill, remains to be decided by God. After Armageddon, an unknown number of people, both righteous and unrighteous, who had died (prior to Armageddon) will be resurrected, with the prospect of living forever in paradise.

Their view of sexual behavior reflects conservative Christian views. Homosexuality and premarital sex are considered sins. Abortion is considered murder.Blood is not to be eaten or transfused.Modesty is heavily encouraged in dress and grooming. Gambling is strictly forbidden. Practices that connote nationalism or false religion are avoided. Weddings, anniversaries, and funerals are typically observed; however, common celebrations and religious or national holidays such as Birthdays, Thanksgiving, and Christmas are regarded as unchristian and are not celebrated.he family structure is patriarchal. The husband is considered the final authority on family decisions, but is strongly encouraged to solicit his wife's thoughts and feelings. Marriages are required to be monogamous. Vigorous efforts are made to spread their beliefs by all members throughout the world in a variety of ways, with particular emphasis on the Watchtower publications. Literature is published in many languages through a wide variety of books, magazines and other publications, with a small number being available in as many as 410 languages.

Jehovah's Witnesses are politically neutral. They feel that their allegiance belongs to God's Kingdom, which is viewed as an actual government. Thus they refrain from saluting the flag of any country or singing nationalistic songs. They believe that such an act would be tantamount to worshipping an idol. Members are expected to obey all laws, including the paying of taxes, of the country in which they reside, so long as these do not violate what they view as God's law.[99] The political neutrality of Jehovah's Witnesses is also expressed by their refusal to participate in military service, even when such is of a compulsory nature, and by their detachment from secular politics. Before 1996, Jehovah's Witnesses also refused alternatives to military service. Jehovah's Witnesses are discouraged, but not prohibited under all circumstances, from voting in elections. They believe voting or elections in themselves are harmless, for example, although they would not generally vote to elect a political leader, they would have no problem voting on a trivial issue such as what color balloons to buy for a party.  They do not stand for any political office.

Aid work after large natural disasters is considered an important part of their work. Large sums of donated money are used in the affected areas to rebuild communities and provide aid. The focus of relief efforts is primarily on helping fellow members, while providing assistance to others in need near the area in which they are working. Examples of relief work include that provided to Hutu and Tutsi victims during the Rwandan genocide, as well as to Congo refugees. Witnesses have also had an active share in the relief work of hurricane Katrina in the United States of America. However, on-going aid work as provided by some other religious groups, such as soup kitchens, clothing donations, or building homes for the homeless is not practiced. The preaching work is regarded as a form of humanitarian effort by giving people hope for the future.

The most important annual event is the commemoration of Jesus' death (referred to as "the Memorial") held after sundown on the date corresponding to Nisan 14 on the Hebrew calendar. Onlookers do not partake of the emblems representing Christ's flesh and blood unless they feel they have the heavenly hope. Typically, in most congregations no one partakes since almost all Witnesses believe their hope is to live on a paradise earth. Weekly meetings are also held, featuring a variety of discourses. Elders and ministerial servants deliver the majority of these, with some student discourses being given by women and men. Certain segments also feature audience participation.


Congregational discipline

Congregational discipline is administered by congregation elders through a 'judicial committee'. When an accusation is made concerning a baptized member, and there is sufficient evidence, a tribunal or judicial committee (usually of three elders) is formed to administer counsel and discipline. Marking is employed when a member persists in conduct that is ill-considered from a doctrinal standpoint, but not in a manner for which disfellowshipping would apply. If a member does not respond to repeated counseling from the elders, a talk may be given regarding the conduct (without naming the individual), 'marking' the member in the minds of those who know of the conduct. Though such a person would not be shunned, social interaction outside of formal worship settings would generally be discouraged. Reproof involves sins which are more serious than those for which one would be "marked". Reproof is given before all who have knowledge of the transgression. The most severe discipline administered is disfellowshipping. The standard for determining whether one should be disfellowshipped is the judicial committee's estimation of the accused's repentance. Members of the judicial committee ask detailed questions and review actions of the member being considered, in consultation with guidelines as set forth by the Governing Body. Baptized members who reject essential doctrine can be disfellowshipped for apostasy. Once the decision to disfellowship has been made, a person has seven days to appeal. If no legitimate appeal is made, the disfellowshipping will be announced to the congregation by letting them know that the person "is no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses". After one is disfellowshipped, all baptized members cut off all association with that person. Exceptions are made in business and family household situations. If the disfellowshipped person is living in the same home with other baptized family members, religious matters are not discussed. Disfellowshipped family members outside the home are shunned. Disfellowshipped members are still permitted to attend Kingdom Hall meetings, but are not allowed to take an active part in meetings or the ministry Members can officially leave the religion by writing a letter requesting to be "disassociated". Alternately, elders may also determine a member has disassociated themself by their actions. Both result in shunning. If a disassociated individual announces that they wish to reassociate, they are shunned by congregation members and may not participate in meetings until the elders announce them as an approved associate. A disfellowshipped individual may return to the congregation if they are deemed sincerely repentant by the congregation elders. The congregation elders that made up the original judicial committee will allow a period of time for the individual to demonstrate their repentance. During this period, congregation members ignore the individual, and the individual is not permitted to comment at congregation meetings. Once a decision is made to reinstate, a brief announcement is made to the congregation that the disfellowshipped member is once again an approved associate of the congregation and one of Jehovah's Witnesses.


 Critical views
One of the most outspoken critics of Jehovah's Witnesses is Raymond Franz, a former third-generation Jehovah's Witnesses. Franz, who served nine years on the Governing Body, uses Galatians 1:16–20 to support his claim that Paul of Tarsus did not view the apostles in Jerusalem as a governing body. He further contends that the council of Jerusalem was an isolated event, and that the creation of a central authority in Christianity was a 4th century development. As well, he argues a sense of guilt is imposed on those not complying with organization arrangements for field service. Further, he contends that engaging in this formal activity became an extra-scriptural requirement placed upon those wanting to qualify for eldership. He claims in addition that an individual's spirituality is judged by the elders on this basis. Further, he is critical of the application of the phrase "house to house" (gr. "kat' oikon") found at Acts 5:42, stating it does not require the idea of consecutive door-to-door visitation. He compares 27 Bible translations, for Acts 2:46, Acts 5:42 and Acts 20:20 showing phrases such as "at home", "at your houses" and "in your homes" are used more often than "house to house". He also maintains that fear of being shunned and/or family break-up/loss causes people to nominally remain members rather than formally disassociate themselves. Also, Franz asserts that the judicial process itself, due to its private and nearly autonomous nature, directly contradicts the precedent found in the Bible and the organization's own teachings, and can be used in an arbitrary manner.

Criticism regarding the procedures on reporting child abuse has also occurred. The current procedure that is followed when allegations of abuse are reported is based on a strict application of the principle at Deuteronomy 19:15: "No single witness should rise up against a man respecting any error or any sin, in the case of any sin that he may commit. At the mouth of two witnesses or at the mouth of three witnesses the matter should stand good" (New World Translation). If an allegation of child abuse is made, and the alleged perpetrator denies it, the local congregational elders will investigate to see if there can be any others who can substantiate the claim. If there are none, the elders do not disfellowship the accused individual, since the accusation may have no merit. However, according to the Jehovah's Witness office of Public information: "Even if the elders cannot take congregational action, they are expected to report the allegation to the branch office of Jehovah's Witnesses in their country, if local privacy laws permit. In addition to making a report to the branch office, the elders may be required by law to report even uncorroborated or unsubstantiated allegations to the authorities. If so, we expect the elders to comply. Additionally, the victim may wish to report the matter to the authorities, and it is his or her absolute right to do so." In 1997 it was also stated that, "For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation." (e.g. serving as elders or ministerial servants) This would be upheld even if the crime was committed years before, or prior to the person's becoming a Witness. The general policy is not premised as punishment to the offender, but seen rather, by the religion, as a means of protecting the congregation's members.


 Controversy

Witnesses teach that after the death of the last apostle, the Church gradually diverged, in a Great Apostasy, from the original teachings of Jesus on several major points. Thus a number of the doctrines of Jehovah's Witnesses differ from those of mainstream Christianity and are considered heresy by some members of these other denominations. Possibly the most controversial doctrinal differences relate to the nature of God and of Jesus, particularly the Jehovah's Witnesses' rejection of the Trinity doctrine. The Encyclopedia Britannica states, "To some Christians the doctrine of the Trinity appeared inconsistent with the unity of God....They therefore denied it, and accepted Jesus Christ, not as incarnate God, but as God's highest creature by Whom all else was created....[this] view in the early Church long contended with the orthodox doctrine." whereas others have criticized the New World Translation, the translation of the Bible published by Jehovah's Witnesses, stating that the group has changed the Bible to suit their doctrine and that the translation contains a number of errors and inaccuracies.

A large number of books have been published that are critical of the Watchtower Tract & Bible Society. Critics state that the Watchtower Society has made a number of unfulfilled predictions and doctrinal changes over the years, while claiming that it is the "one and only channel"[124] used by God to continually dispense truth.

Critics have also challenged the Witnesses' policies on blood transfusions, stating that their requirements are inconsistent and contradictory.Witnesses respond that blood as the fluid per se is not the real issue. They say the real issue is respect and obedience for God’s personal property- blood. That the matter blood is not at stake, is seen in the fact that members are allowed to eat meat which will still have some blood left in it. As soon as blood is drained from an animal, the respect has been shown to God and then a person can eat the meat even though it will contain a small amount of blood.

Critics have also argued that various Witness policies and practices — including the treatment of members who dissociate or are disfellowshipped, limiting of external information about the group from former members, and the regulation of members' lives — limit the ability of members to exercise personal freedom. Witnesses teach that “freedom to make decisions [is] to be exercised within the boundaries of God’s laws and principles.”  And that “only Jehovah [is] free to set the standard of what is good and bad.”

The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society's former affiliation with the Department of Public Information of the United Nations has been controversial. Also controversial has been the view of Jehovah's Witnesses towards other religions.

Some countries such as Uzbekistan, Cuba, Belarus, and the city of Moscow have opposed the building of facilities (such as Kingdom Halls) and the holding of large conventions in their territory. Though such opposition is at times specifically directed at the religious group, at other times more mundane concerns are involved, such as traffic congestion and noise. In some legal cases, (such as Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de St-Jérôme-Lafontaine v. Lafontaine (Village)), disputes that have been about appropriate land use have been claimed by the Witnesses to have come out of religious bias.
 

Organizational structure of Jehovah's Witnesses   Jehovah's Witnesses and blood     Beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses

Beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses


 

 
 
 

   

Books  Other Book Recommendations  Definition of Words  Contact us at life@spiritual.com   Disclaimer Future Works   Spiritual Ideas Home

New Testament Bible Stories   Old Testament Bible Stories Hinduism  Spiritual Articles Spirituality Information

Yoga Sutras of Patanjali Religious Lectures Spiritual Books Lost Gospels Spiritual Blog