|
| |
God
as unity or Trinity
Muslims, Jews, Jehovah's Witnesses and a small fraction of other nominal
Christians are Unitarian monotheists. Unitarian monotheists hold that there is
only one "person" (so to speak), or one basic substance, in God. Some adherents
of this position consider Trinitarianism to be a form of polytheism.
The vast majority of Christians have been and still are Trinitarian monotheists.
Trinitarian monotheists believe in one God that exists as three interdependent
persons who share the same substance/essence; the Christian version of this is
called the Trinity. The Hindu version Trimurti, differs from Christianity in
holding that God has three aspects, though shown as anthropomorphist.
Trinitarians hold that the three persons of God have the same purpose, holiness,
and sovereignty, and therefore each can be worshipped as God, without violating
the idea that there is only truly one God to which worship belongs.
Negative theology
Some Jewish, Christian and Muslim Medieval philosophers, including Moses
Maimonides and Pseudo-Dionysius, as well as many sages of other religions,
developed what is termed as Apophatic Theology or the Via Negativa, the idea
that one cannot posit attributes to God and can only be discussed by what God is
not. For example, we cannot say that God "exists" in the usual sense of the
term, because that term is human defined and God's qualities such as existence
may not be accurately characterized by it. What we can safely say is that it
cannot be proven empirically or otherwise that God is existent, therefore God is
not non-existent. Likewise God's "wisdom" is of a fundamentally different kind
from limited human perception. So we cannot use the word "wise" to describe God,
because this implies he is wise in the way we usually describe humans being
wise. However we can safely say that God is not ignorant. We should not say that
God is One, because we may not truly understand his nature, but we can state
that there is no multiplicity in God's being.
The reason that this theology was developed was because it was felt that
ascribing positive characteristics to God would imply that God could be
accurately described with terms that were used to describe human qualities and
perceptions. As humans cannot truly comprehend what kind of wisdom an eternal
transcendent being might have, or what infinity might be like, we cannot in fact
know or characterize His true nature. It is beyond human ability and would only
mislead people. The proponents of this theory often experienced meditation which
they viewed as the only effective way of having a personal relationship with
God. It involved trying to reach beyond the words commonly used to describe Him
and His more ineffable characteristics, and to comprehend in a mystical manner
the truths about Him which could not be achieved through religious language.
Thus many sages and saints of both monotheistic and other traditions experienced
mystical trances, or raptures and stated they were unable to describe God or
their visions fully.
Binitarianism
A view within Christianity that there were originally two beings in the Godhead,
the Father and the Word that became the Son (Jesus the Christ). Binitarians
normally believe that God is a family, currently consisting of the Father and
the Son. Some binitarians believe that others will ultimately be born into that
divine family. Hence, binitarians are nontrinitarian, but they are also not
unitarian. Binitarians, like most unitarians and trinitarians, claim their views
were held by the original New Testament Church. Unlike most unitarians and
trinitarians who tend to identify themselves by those terms, binitarians
normally do not refer to their belief in the duality of the Godhead, with the
Son subordinate to the Father; they simply teach the Godhead in a manner that
has been termed as binitarianism.
"The word “binitarian” is typically used by scholars and theologians as a
contrast to a trinitarian theology: a theology of “two” in God rather than a
theology of “three”, and although some critics prefer to use the term ditheist
or dualist instead of binitarian, those terms suggests that God is not one, yet
binitarians believe that God is one family. It is accurate to offer the judgment
that most commonly when someone speaks of a Christian “binitarian” theology the
“two” in God are the Father and the Son...A substantial amount of recent
scholarship has been devoted to exploring the implications of the fact that
Jesus was worshipped by those first Jewish Christians, since in Judaism
"worship" was limited to the worship of God" (Barnes M. Early Christian
Binitarianism: the Father and the Holy Spirit. Early Christian Binitarianism—as
read at NAPS 2001). Much of this recent scholarship has been the result of the
translations of the Nag Hammadi and other ancient manuscripts which were not
available when older scholarly texts (such as W. Bousset's Kyrios Christos,
1913) were written.
Conception of God in Sikhism
The Sikh term for God is Vahigurū and Nānak describes him as niraṅkār (from the
Sanskrit nirākārā, meaning formless), akāl (meaning eternal) and alakh (from the
Sanskrit alakśya, meaning invisible or unobserved). At the very beginning of the
first composition of Sikh scripture is the figure "1" — signifying the unity of
God. Nānak's interpretation of God is that of a single, personal and
transcendental creator with whom the devotee must develop a most intimate faith
and relationship to achieve salvation. Sikhism advocates the belief in one God
who is omnipresent and has infinite qualities. This aspect has been repeated on
numerous occasions in the Gurū Granth Sāhib and the term ik ōaṅkār signifies
this. In the Sikh teachings, there is no gender for God. When translating, the
proper meaning cannot be correctly conveyed without using a gender definition,
but this distorts the meaning by giving the impression that God is masculine,
which is not the message in the original script.
Nānak further emphasizes that a full understanding of God is beyond human
beings. However, Nānak also describes God, who in his fullness is unknowable, is
not wholly unknowable. God is sarav vi'āpak (omnipresent) in all creation and
visible everywhere to the spiritually awakened. Nānak stresses that God must be
seen from "the inward eye," or the "heart" of a human being - that meditation
must take place inwardly to achieve enlightenment progressively. Nānak
emphasizes this revelation in creation as crucial, as its rigorous application
permits the existence of communication between God and human beings.
The Sikhs believe in one God who is the God of all the peoples of the World; the
Creator; has existed from the beginning of time; never dies and will survive
forever. He/She is genderless; without form; fearless; without enemies; self
sufficient; not subject of the cycle of birth and death; All Powerful; etc -
God's qualities are too many for people to narrate. Many names are used for
God:- Waheguru - The Wonderful Lord; Satnam - Thy True Name is TRUTH . Malik -
Master; Karta Purakh - The Creator, etc.
God in Sikhism is depicted in three distinct aspects, viz. God in Himself, God
in relation to creation, and God in relation to man. God by himself is the one
Ultimate, Transcendent Reality, Nirguna (without attributes), Timeless,
Boundless, Formless, Ever-existent, Immutable, Ineffable, All-by Himself and
even Unknowable in His entirety. The only nomenclatures that can rightly be
applied to Him in this state of sunn (Sanskrit, sunya or void) are Brahma and
Parbrahma (Sanskrit, Parbrahman) or the pronouns He and Thou. During a discourse
with Siddhas, Hindu recluses, Guru Nanak in reply to a question as to where the
Transcendent God was before the stage of creation replies, "To think of the
Transcendent Lord in that state is to enter the realm of wonder. Even at that
stage of sunn, he permeated all that Void" (GG, 940). This is the state of God's
sunn samadhi, self-absorbed trance.
Conceptions of God in Hinduism
| |
|