|
| |
Abiogenesis
(Greek a-bio-genesis, "non biological origins") is, in its most general
sense, the generation of life from non-living matter. Today the term is
primarily used to refer to hypotheses about the chemical origin of life, such as
from a primordial sea or in the vicinity of hydrothermal vents, and most
probably through a number of intermediate steps, such as non-living but
self-replicating molecules (biopoiesis). Abiogenesis remains a hypothesis,
meaning it is the working assumption for scientists researching how life began.
If it were proven false, then another line of thought would be used to modify or
replace abiogenesis as a hypothesis. If test results provide sufficient support
for acceptance, then that is the point at which it would become a theory.
Hypotheses
Spontaneous Generation
Classical notions of abiogenesis, now more precisely known as spontaneous
generation, held that complex, living organisms are generated by decaying
organic substances, e.g. that mice spontaneously appear in stored grain or
maggots spontaneously appear in meat.
According to Aristotle it was a readily observable truth that aphids arise from
the dew which falls on plants, fleas from putrid matter, mice from dirty hay,
and so forth. In the 17th century such assumptions started to be questioned;
such as that by Sir Thomas Browne in his Pseudodoxia Epidemica, subtitled
Enquiries into Very many Received Tenets, and Commonly Presumed Truths, of 1646,
an attack on false beliefs and "vulgar errors." His conclusions were not widely
accepted, e.g. his contemporary, Alexander Ross wrote: "To question this (i.e.,
spontaneous generation) is to question reason, sense and experience. If he
doubts of this let him go to Egypt, and there he will find the fields swarming
with mice, begot of the mud of Nylus, to the great calamity of the inhabitants."
However, experimental scientists continued to decrease the conditions within
which the spontaneous generation of complex organisms could be observed. The
first step was taken by the Italian Francesco Redi, who, in 1668, proved that no
maggots appeared in meat when flies were prevented from laying eggs. From the
seventeenth century onwards it was gradually shown that, at least in the case of
all the higher and readily visible organisms, the previous sentiment regarding
spontaneous generation was false. The alternative seemed to be omne vivum ex ovo:
that every living thing came from a pre-existing living thing.
Then in 1683 Antoni van Leeuwenhoek discovered bacteria, and it was soon found
that however carefully organic matter might be protected by screens, or by being
placed in stoppered receptacles, putrefaction set in, and was always accompanied
by the appearance of myriad bacteria and other low organisms. As knowledge of
microscopic forms of life increased, so the apparent realm of abiogenesis
increased, and it became tempting to hypothesize that while abiogenesis might
not take place for creatures visible to the naked eye, at the microscopic level,
living organisms continually arose from inorganic matter.
In 1768 Lazzaro Spallanzani proved that microbes came from the air, and could be
killed by boiling. Yet it was not until 1862 that Louis Pasteur performed a
series of careful experiments which disproved that organisms such as bacteria
and fungi appear in nutrient rich media of their own accord in non-living
material and supported cell theory.
Three years earlier, Darwin's On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection (published in 1859), had presented an argument that modern organisms
had evolved, over immense periods of time, from simpler ancestral forms, that
species changed over time in accordance with cell theory. Darwin himself
declined to speculate on some implications of his theory - that at some point
there may have existed an ur-organism with no prior ancestor and that such an
organism may have come into existence, formed from non-living molecules.
Although Pasteur had demonstrated that modern organisms do not generate
spontaneously in nonliving nutrients, science seemed to be moving in opposing
directions. However, Pasteur's experiments were limited to a closed limited
system for a very brief (geologically) time period of modern scientific
experimentation, and not to time scales on millions or billions of years on the
open surface of a planet. The ur-organism implication of Darwin's theories would
have occurred in the deep geological past, the dawn of time on this planet, 3.87
billion years ago, and it had a billion years from the beginning of the planet
to be formed.
Scientific Approaches To The Meaning
of Life Entropy and Life
What is Life?
Philosophical views on the meaning of
life
Religion and Religious
humanism
Spiritual and mystical views Cosmogony
Abiogenesis
Emanationism Eschatology
Back to
Spiritual Ideas
| |
|